![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
EDUCAUSE Quarterly
|
![]() |
IT Reductions and RegulationsIT Reductions and Regulations
If you work at an institution of higher education in the United States today, then you are probably in the middle of a budget reduction frenzy. Complaints about the rising cost of education and “administrative bloat” appear regularly in news headlines. Anecdotal data tells me, though, that in times of budgetary constraints the so-called administrative side takes deeper cuts than the academic side. In most institutions, if you are not a full-time faculty member, then by default you belong to the administration. Even though many IT departments live in the academic side of the house, their roles are seen as more administrative. In talking to my colleagues, it appears that IT is expected to move into maintenance mode, or what I typically refer to as “keeping the ship afloat.” This usually means reducing or cancelling training, putting new projects on hold, and significantly extending the timelines of existing projects. Keeping the ship afloat used to mean that we kept the network, phones, ERP, and LMS systems running, but now, it also means that we have to keep complying with all of the unfunded mandates and regulations that have piled up over the years. With this concern in mind, examine cost-cutting proposals from other departments that suggest they would achieve savings through “increased automation” — without recognizing the ongoing requirements for regulatory compliance. If your campus is in the unfortunate position of having to reduce staff, think carefully about positioning your institution to meet regulatory obligations over the next couple of years. Regulatory Compliance for IT DepartmentsWhether in a centralized or decentralized environment, IT has increasingly become responsible for risk management. For which regulations is IT responsible on your campus? Take a moment and jot them down. I will bet that you came up with the Acceptable Use Policy, the Information Security Policy, FERPA, and DMCA. These are the obvious ones — the ones that have gotten a lot of exposure. Now, let’s peel the layers of the onion a little more.
This list is certainly not meant to be exhaustive, but it should get you thinking about how you handle regulatory responsibilities on your campus. Costs of Failing to Meet RequirementsViolation of any of these policies, laws, or regulations can bring serious sanctions and, in many cases, hefty fines. Generally speaking, a data breach costs an organization about $202 per disclosed record. This includes costs for the investigation, customer notification, data preservation, attorney fees, consumer credit monitoring service, and fines. HIPAA assesses $25,000 for accidental violation, but knowing misuse or disclosure can carry fines of $50,000 and one year of imprisonment. PCI fines reportedly run into the hundreds of thousands of dollars, but the more costly sanction is the removal of an institution’s capability to accept credit card payments. Imagine how crippling that could be to a college or university. Will your budget reductions put you in jeopardy of not meeting your regulatory obligations? Reputation is perhaps the most difficult cost to measure. If a breach or violation occurs, the negative press can be devastating to an institution. While it is not possible to guarantee you will never have a data breach or fall out of compliance with a regulation, you certainly want to take all possible steps to minimize the risk. Plan Ahead to Minimize RisksWhen forced to reduce staff and plan for others to assume their responsibilities, make sure you understand the skills and training required. It could take months of training to get staff up to speed on regulatory requirements. Unfortunately, many departments will have to make budget cuts so quickly that they will not have time for a thorough transition plan. To make budget reductions strategically, you really need to have a comprehensive inventory of your staff and their skills and current duties. Each budget reduction proposal that purports to decrease administrative bloat and increase efficiency should be examined to ensure that the current personnel or process isn’t there in support of a legal or regulatory requirement. If you still have to make the reduction, look for opportunities where you have a cross-trained team and can spread the duties, then measure the risk. Know which requirements are mandatory and which related threats could be “risk accepted.” What are the consequences of experiencing a data breach, a FERPA claim, a copyright violation, an accreditation follow-up visit, or a PCI violation? You will have to weigh the financial, political, and public relations costs for each possibility. As an IT risk manager, which of those are you willing to chance? Now is the time to proactively work with your colleagues across the institution to ensure that your cuts will not impact their ability to meet regulations and likewise to make sure that their contemplated cuts will not severely impact your ability to keep the institution in compliance. © 2009 Sharon E. Blanton. The text of this article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 license. |
![]() |
| Unless otherwise noted, EDUCAUSE holds the copyright on all materials published by the association, whether in print or electronic form. In certain cases the work remains the intellectual property of the individual author(s) (see Special Circumstances). Content from conference speeches, presentations, blogs, wikis and feeds reflect the opinions of the author, and not necessarily those of EDUCAUSE or its members. | |||