![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
EDUCAUSE Review
|
![]() |
Never Mind the Edupunks; or, The Great Word Count Swindle© 2010 Brian Lamb and Jim Groom. The text of this article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). EDUCAUSE Review, vol. 45, no. 4 (July/August 2010): 50–58
Given the space limitations imposed on us by The Man of this issue of EDUCAUSE Review, we were not really able to go into as much detail as we would have preferred, in particular about the practical elements of what open educational technology practice looks like. This short coming felt particularly acute to us when it came to our case studies, which receive only the briefest of overviews. So we are very grateful that the subjects of our case studies have been kind enough to offer up more information on how they see their work.
We also cannot resist pointing to a couple artifacts highlighting open educational technology on our own campuses:
Obviously, this is just a sampling. These examples do not begin to capture the wild diversity of what open, public service learning can mean—both in terms of technology strategy and in terms of how we think about educational practice. We hope you will share your own favorites—either by linking to them in the comments field below or, better yet, via a blog post of your own, showing the love for your open ed tech heroes! (We'd appreciate a heads-up on those in the comments field as well.)
|
![]() |
| EDUCAUSE Review authors retain the copyright to their intellectual content, with EDUCAUSE owning the copyright to the magazine presentation as a whole. Individual articles may be licensed under Creative Commons licenses. Content from EDUCAUSE Review articles reflect the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of EDUCAUSE or its members. For more information about EDUCAUSE copyright, please see http://www.educause.edu/copyright. | |||