Higher Education Act Reauthorization Not a Done Deal

Created by Anna Gould (EDUCAUSE) on August 1, 2008

While many education groups were relieved to hear that Congress finally acted after six years and passed a conference report for the Higher Education Act Reauthorization, the White House could still complicate things.

According to CongressDaily, White House spokesman Scott Stanzel says President Bush is still undecided about signing the bill. Stanzel said the President needs time to look at the Conference Committee's modifications.

It is possible the Administration will hear from the National Governors Association (NGA) as it considers the bill. The NGA actively opposed the higher ed bill because it contained a provision that would require states to show they are maintaining the same level of funding. The group says this penalizes states, who would have to defend why they made a one-time increased funding allocation during times of surplus, but had to go back to previous funding levels in more challenging economic times.

"States will be unable to make major increases or invest one-time surpluses in higher education during good times because they will be penalized if forced to reduce spending during difficult times," the NGA said in a statement.

Could the case for federalism convince Bush to vote against the HEA?

Anna's blog
Login or register to post comments
284 reads

		Higher Education Act Reauthorization Not a Done Deal Created by Anna Gould (EDUCAUSE) on August 1, 2008 While many education groups were relieved to hear that Congress finally acted after six years and passed a conference report for the Higher Education Act Reauthorization, the White House could still complicate things. According to CongressDaily, White House spokesman Scott Stanzel says President Bush is still undecided about signing the bill. Stanzel said the President needs time to look at the Conference Committee's modifications. It is possible the Administration will hear from the National Governors Association (NGA) as it considers the bill. The NGA actively opposed the higher ed bill because it contained a provision that would require states to show they are maintaining the same level of funding. The group says this penalizes states, who would have to defend why they made a one-time increased funding allocation during times of surplus, but had to go back to previous funding levels in more challenging economic times. "States will be unable to make major increases or invest one-time surpluses in higher education during good times because they will be penalized if forced to reduce spending during difficult times," the NGA said in a statement. Could the case for federalism convince Bush to vote against the HEA? Washington Update \| Congress \| Higher Education Act \| Higher Education Act Reauthorization Anna's blog Login or register to post comments 284 reads
		© Copyright 1999-2009 EDUCAUSE Need Help? \| Feedback \| Privacy Policy
	Unless otherwise noted, EDUCAUSE holds the copyright on all materials published by the association, whether in print or electronic form. In certain cases the work remains the intellectual property of the individual author(s) (see Special Circumstances). Content from conference speeches, presentations, blogs, wikis and feeds reflect the opinions of the author, and not necessarily those of EDUCAUSE or its members.