![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Faculty Development Issue: When (And How) To Introduce Faculty to TechnologyCreated by Mark Morton (University of Waterloo) on March 15, 2006
In October of 2005, I emailed about forty individuals who have expertise in faculty development as it pertains to instructional technologies. In my email, I asked them this question: in a workshop or training program that's designed to help instructors learn to use online technologies in ways that promote active, student-centered learning, at what point should those instructors actually be introduced to the technology? That is, should one discuss the technology before discussing the pedagogy, or should one discuss the technology after discussing the pedagogy, or should one blend together the discussions of technology and pedagogy in an iterative manner? As it turned out, there was a clear consensus among the 37 individuals who responded to my query; I discuss that consensus in the attached PDF, which comprises a synthesis of the responses as well as an appendix that includes all of the responses in their entirety. -- Mark
|
![]() |
|
| Unless otherwise noted, EDUCAUSE holds the copyright on all materials published by the association, whether in print or electronic form. In certain cases the work remains the intellectual property of the individual author(s) (see Special Circumstances). Content from conference speeches, presentations, blogs, wikis and feeds reflect the opinions of the author, and not necessarily those of EDUCAUSE or its members. | |||
Can't open it, Mark - Acrobat gives me an error message about being unable to decrypt it. Is it just me? I tried via two browsers, fwiw.
Hi, Joe -- Sorry, I think I originally saved the PDF in version 7.0 of Acrobat. I've now re-saved it, and re-attached it, so that it should open in any version of Acrobat. Thanks for letting me know. Mark
Thanks, Mark - works fine now.
Thanks for sharing. I would also consider the third options you identify as optimal. Discussing pedagogy and the possible tools that support the method in context with one another makes most sense. One difficulty I can see with it, is that on some campuses there is a group that deals with instructional technology and a group that deals with faculty development. This divide (whether intended or not) between those responsible for developing pedagogical skills and those responsible for teaching the instructional technology is sometimes hard to bridge.