Main Nav

Cross-posted from the Openness in Education constituent group: "Keeping MOOCs Open" https://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/34852

This article nicely outlines the "dual meaning of 'open'" that many have noted regarding MOOCs: that of open enrollment, and openly licensed content.

The author makes a good case for both kinds of "open," but I bet the major players are holding on to their content pretty tightly right now before they can figure out the economics of this whole thing.

I also wonder about a third aspect of "open" not addressed here – that of the platform itself. I keep seeing EdX being described as "open source" (like here http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2012/uc-berkeley-joins-mit-harvard-in-edx-...), but I have yet to hear anything about the actual availability of this source code.

// Jason

--
Jason Blanchard
Instructional Designer

School of Education
Goodwin College of Professional Studies
Drexel University
One Drexel Plaza
3001 Market Street, Suite 100
Philadelphia, PA 19104
Tel: 215-571-3927 |  Fax: 215.895.2153
Drexel.edu/soe
Goodwin.drexel.edu
********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.