< Back to Main Site

EDUCAUSE review onlineEDUCAUSE review online

Lost and Found


© 2005 Richard N. Katz

EDUCAUSE Review, vol. 40, no. 5 (September/October 2005): 84.

One of the most interesting opportunities that I have, as a leader of EDUCAUSE, is engaging with members of a diverse professional community. For me, a particularly intriguing honor is serving on the American Management Association’s IT Advisory Council, a panel consisting chiefly of CIOs from Fortune 100 companies such as Disney, Solectron, Time-Warner, and Allstate. These men and women oversee technical staff numbering in the thousands and annual budgets measuring in the hundreds of millions of dollars. After four meetings, I have now settled comfortably amid these captains of industry and have tuned my ear to their concerns. In my observations, I have also asked myself: Are CIOs from industry and academia cut from the same cloth? Are we pursuing similar goals in a similar fashion? My conclusion is that whereas industry CIOs—the people who assemble the infrastructure, build and support the applications, staff the help desks, and so forth—are most definitely members of the species Homo technologicus, they are definitely not members of the subspecies academicus!

Corporate CIOs worry dominantly about four issues: (1) expense reduction; (2) IT architecture; (3) the sourcing (or outsourcing) of talent, solutions, and technology; and (4) Sarbanes-Oxley compliance. In distant fifth place is IT governance, a concern that clearly does resonate with higher education CIOs. Frankly, my head ached from trying to reconcile the EDUCAUSE list of current issues with this focused (narrow?) set of corporate IT concerns. How could it be, I wondered, that professionals with the same basic training and, arguably, the same basic charge could have such radically different priorities? I began to worry that perhaps the divergence of priorities indicated an irreconcilable divorce between the academy and the society it serves. Few of my academic colleagues have either the passion or the urgency for cost-cutting as do these corporate mavens. And accountability? This group of corporate CIOs report spending 10–25 percent of their professional time with Sarbanes-Oxley compliance!

I was befuddled. I was lost.

Not too long ago, I met with my colleagues Bob Kvavik and Phil Goldstein to review the data from the new ECAR study of IT investment and business process performance. We were all perplexed and chagrined by the data suggesting that our community judged many higher education business processes to be “adequate, at best.” In many cases, “adequate” was almost a compliment. The academic CIOs seemed to be saying: “Implement the ERP, accept the inherent processes if you must, and move on.” By contrast, my industry colleagues talk about standardizing “best practice” processes and striving to render such best practices into software so that these processes can (when nonstrategic) be commoditized and then outsourced. They would say: “Find the best practice, emulate it, codify it, and make it cheap.”

As we discussed this, Bob, Phil, and I struggled to understand the seemingly irrational behavior of higher education decision-makers. After an uncomfortable silence, Bob looked up and said, “They’re satisficing.” “Of course!” Phil and I agreed. In 1957, the future Nobel laureate Herbert Simon broke with classical economists and argued that decision-makers in environments with limited information (“bounded rationality”—surely he was describing higher education) did not look for optimal solutions. Instead, Simon predicted (and the ECAR data have confirmed), decision-makers will consciously relax their rationality and settle for solutions that are “good enough,” in the belief that better solutions would have to justify the extra costs carried in finding them. Simon called this behavior satisficing.

Having spent much time in my career scrambling to explain to board members, legislators, parents, corporate partners, and others why higher education doesn’t act “like a business,” it suddenly occurred to me that higher education does act like a business. A business whose mission is discovery, learning, and engagement! Such a business does not derive sustainable advantage from effectively managing its supply chain; instead, it puts effort and resources into particle detectors, telescopes, and libraries.

As the Gospel goes: I was lost, but now I am found.

Simon’s work on administrative decision-making should be required reading for all of us working in higher education. Once we understand that we are all satisficing, we can proceed guiltlessly! On the other hand, could it be that over time, our corporate counterparts will operate state-of-the-art processes more cheaply than we can operate processes that are just “good enough”? Then what? For how long will “good enough” be good enough?

Am I lost again?

Richard N. Katz

Mr. Richard N. Katz is the founder and chairman of Edudata, a Colorado-based research and analysis firm focused on the rapidly evolving e-learning market in higher education.

Through Richard N. Katz & Associates, Mr. Katz also consults on strategy, technology, and performance and compliance management with governments, corporations, and colleges and universities worldwide. He serves on a number of corporate, university, and association governing and advisory boards. Katz is an internationally known speaker and author. He has delivered more than 200 keynote addresses, and he has written or edited seven books and more than 75 articles, monographs, and book chapters.

Katz served 14 years as vice president of EDUCAUSE and was the founding director of the EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research (ECAR). He had executive responsibility for establishing the first combined EDUCAUSE annual conference, The EDUCAUSE Review, and EQ. Katz oversaw EDUCAUSE corporate relations, and he forged relationships with EUNIS (Europe), CAUDIT (Australia), the Northwest Academic Computing Consortium (NWACC), the New England Computing Program (NERCOMP), the Seminars on Academic Computing (SAC), and the College and University Computer Users Association (CUMREC).

Prior to joining EDUCAUSE, Katz held a variety of senior positions spanning 14 years at the University of California (UC). He staffed the nine-campus UC system's Improved Management Initiative, coordinating and leading groups charged with rethinking university approaches to accounting and finance, human resources management, capital programs, and institutional assessment. As Executive Director of Business Planning and Practices, he was responsible for guiding or implementing many of these strategic management initiatives. Katz was the second recipient of that university’s Award for Innovative Management and Leadership.


Tags from the EDUCAUSE Library

Most Popular

Stay Up-to-Date

RSS Email Twitter

Share Your Work and Ideas

Issues coming up will focus on designing the future of higher ed, digital engagement, and new business models. Share your work and ideas with EDUCAUSE Review Online.

E-mail us >


EDUCAUSE Members: $4.00
Non-Members: $4.00

Annual Conference
September 29–October 2
View Proceedings

Events for all Levels and Interests

Whether you're looking for a conference to attend face-to-face to connect with peers, or for an online event for team professional development, see what's upcoming.


Digital Badges
Member recognition effort
Earn yours >

Career Center

Leadership and Management Programs

EDUCAUSE Institute
Project Management



Jump Start Your Career Growth

Explore EDUCAUSE professional development opportunities that match your career aspirations and desired level of time investment through our interactive online guide.


EDUCAUSE organizes its efforts around three IT Focus Areas



Join These Programs If Your Focus Is


Get on the Higher Ed IT Map

Employees of EDUCAUSE member institutions and organizations are invited to create individual profiles.



2014 Strategic Priorities

  • Building the Profession
  • IT as a Game Changer
  • Foundations

Learn More >

Uncommon Thinking for the Common Good™

EDUCAUSE is the foremost community of higher education IT leaders and professionals.