< Back to Main Site

EDUCAUSE review onlineEDUCAUSE review online

The Myth about Controlling IT


© 2007 Diana G. Oblinger and Brian L. Hawkins. The text of this article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).

EDUCAUSE Review, vol. 42, no. 6 (November/December 2007): 20–21

The Myth about Controlling IT
"The CIO Is in Control of IT."

Diana G. Oblinger and Brian L. Hawkins
Diana G. Oblinger is Vice President of EDUCAUSE, where she is responsible for the association's teaching and learning activities and for the direction of the EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative (ELI). Brian L. Hawkins is President of EDUCAUSE. Comments on this article can be sent to the authors at doblinger@educause.edu and bhawkins@educause.edu and/or can be posted to the Web via the link at the bottom of this page.

Many in higher education assume that the Chief Information Officer (CIO) controls IT at his or her college or university—from operational issues to future directions. After all, the rationale for having a CIO is to consolidate responsibility for IT in one place.

But assumptions and reality may be quite different. Consider infrastructure. Although it would seem that the CIO controls the infrastructure—purchasing massive amounts of hardware and software, managing the network, and monitoring compliance with standards—there are other control points as well. For example, when a faculty member receives a grant with equipment dollars, odds are that the control of those dollars rests with the faculty member rather than the CIO. Or when the development office decides to acquire a new software package to track potential donors, the CIO may have little say in and no control over which package is chosen. Of course, the largest segment of any campus population is the students. And control is not likely to be the term a CIO would use when discussing student computers, the installed software, or the kind of security settings used. The reality is that the CIO is not in control of the IT infrastructure.

Beyond the physical infrastructure, there is an IT organization of support and technical staff. Even though many "IT staff" do ultimately report to the CIO, many more do not. With IT today forming a part of every unit on campus, IT staff are often found in admissions and registration, libraries, academic departments, facilities, public safety, student life, and more areas. Control is an illusion when so many staff are distributed among campus units.

Control is also elusive when it comes to planning for the future. IT innovations—in hardware, software, networks—are not particularly predictable. CIOs cannot control the creation of new technologies, nor can they control the emergence of new needs among users.

This "lack of control" in no way devalues the critical role of the CIO to the institution. Control is simply an incorrect term—particularly for an environment undergoing constant change. Rather, the role of the CIO is more about managing expectations and shaping the evolution of IT. Rosabeth Moss Kanter1 describes a set of innovation and change skills that have great relevance to the IT environment. A look at how a CIO actually spends his or her time reveals activities such as building coalitions, nurturing teams, communicating with administrators, faculty, and students, and monitoring the environment.

Managing IT in colleges and universities cannot be approached as an individual, controlled activity; it requires influence, which often depends on building coalitions. For example, if an institution wants to improve teaching and learning through technology, IT is only one group involved in a coalition that puts IT in service to learning. Other critical groups include faculty, students, and the library. In addition, influencing a decision within a coalition involves selling an idea and making compromises. For instance, to improve administrative efficiency through the use of IT, the IT shop may advocate a standard implementation of an ERP system. However, the off-the-shelf configuration will likely need to be adapted to meet the needs of administrative staff; consultation and compromise are required. Finally, the partnerships that are central to these coalitions often involve internal as well as external stakeholders. Internal groups obviously include faculty and staff; external partners may include the corporate community, trustees, state procurement offices, and other institutions. Managing IT is thus much less about control than it is about influence—and coalitions allow interested parties to influence each other, resulting in the best possible outcomes.

Just as coalitions are required in IT, so are teams. Anyone who wants to change an institution using IT must become skilled at nurturing teams. This goes well beyond selecting those team members with the skills necessary to accomplish the task. Increasingly it means helping the team develop a shared sense of purpose and trust in one another. Nurturing a team and instilling a sense of purpose and vision might just as easily be done by the provost or president as the CIO. The involvement of IT in a project does not mean that the project team, or its leadership, will come only from the IT shop.

Building coalitions and nurturing teams require good communication skills. CIOs manage change and expectations by communicating with administrators, faculty, and students. For example, the CIO must be able to communicate to the president the power of analytics—along with realistic expectations for implementation and adoption—without the technical details of data warehousing, data mining, data cleansing, logistic regression, and so on. The CIO must be able to communicate to faculty the need to adopt security procedures to ensure that their academic freedom is protected. The CIO must be able to communicate to students the risks of putting too much information online through Facebook. Although individuals with technical or engineering skills are not always assumed to be strong communicators, communication is a skill that CIOs—and others in IT—must develop.

In an environment of rapid change, one of the best methods for "control" is constantly monitoring the environment. Institutions must stay in touch not only with technical changes but also with changes in users' expectations. Students and faculty, for example, have higher expectations for support than in previous years. And one of the best ways to prepare for cyberinfrastructure is to stay abreast of the changes in how cyberinfrastructure is applied to research and teaching, requirements for data storage, metadata, and so on. When institutions are unaware of the changes on the horizon, they cannot prepare for them. Monitoring changes includes scanning for those issues that involve IT directly as well as those in which IT is only one part of the solution.

In thinking about fostering institutional innovation and change through IT, rather than "controlling" IT, the CIO and other members of the executive team should ask themselves the following strategic questions:

  1. Do we think about IT as something that can be controlled, or are we trying to manage its evolution to suit institutional goals? Although it might seem desirable to control IT—costs, platforms, software, security, and so on—control is likely to be elusive. A better strategy is to manage the evolution of IT to suit the institution's needs, capitalizing on new technologies, management strategies, and organizational structures where possible.
  2. Does the executive team work as a team or coalition, modeling good practice for other units? If IT is used in service to the institution's goals, IT will always be partnered with other organizations. Do IT and administration, or IT and academic affairs, or IT and finance work together? Do the groups work side by side to craft solutions, or are problems handed off to IT? If the executive team does not model such teamwork, can other units be expected to behave any differently?
  3. Are we monitoring the internal and external environment to ensure that we are using IT to the best advantage? Although the institution may not be able to control a rapidly changing environment, it cannot simply ignore that environment. What mechanisms does the institution have in place to constantly monitor higher education issues, the application of IT, users' expectations, or novel solutions? Beyond being aware of changes, does the executive team have the capacity to make a decision to change—and then to act on that decision?
  4. Are we remembering that making decisions about IT may be less about IT and more about good decision-making? It is easy to assume that making decisions about IT means deciding on technology. Executive teams must remember that IT decision-making is all about problem solving: identifying the problem, looking for solutions, allocating resources, communicating, managing expectations, and assessing the outcomes. Problem-solving involves teams. Problem-solving involves creativity. And problem-solving involves prioritization—knowing which problems are most important to solve.

It is indeed a myth that anyone can control IT at a college or university. Rather, in an environment where participation, collaboration, and rapid change are the norm, the ultimate goal should be to influence the evolution and manage the expectations of IT.


1. Rosabeth Moss Kanter, Evolve! Succeeding in the Digital Culture of Tomorrow (Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2001).

Brian L. Hawkins

Brian L. Hawkins was president of EDUCAUSE from 1998-2007. Prior to joining EDUCAUSE, Hawkins was senior vice president for Academic Planning and Administrative Affairs at Brown University. In this capacity, he oversaw academic planning, instructional budget management, campus computing, enrollment management, institutional research, summer programs, admission, financial aid, and student registration. Hawkins went to Brown in 1986 as vice president for Computing and Information Services. In 1989, he filled in as senior vice president for Finance and Administration, and then was appointed special assistant to the president for Academic Planning while he spearheaded Brown’s strategic planning processes. In 1997, he served as part of a three-person team standing in for the president of Brown University.

Before going to Brown, Hawkins was associate vice president for Academic Affairs at Drexel University. At Drexel, he was responsible for general academic planning and the first academic program in the nation to require access to a microcomputer, as well as integrating the use of technology throughout the curriculum.

Hawkins is a management professor by training and the author of one book and many articles on organizational behavior. He received his bachelor’s and master’s degrees from Michigan State University and his doctorate from Purdue University. He taught at The University of Texas at San Antonio (UTSA) and served there as department chairman and assistant dean of the College of Business. His organizational work focused on organizational structure, conflict management, communication, and performance appraisal. He earned tenure as faculty member at both UTSA and Drexel.

Hawkins has combined his academic and business experience to serve as a consultant to more than 350 organizations. In 1983, the governor of Pennsylvania asked him to initiate a corporate, industrial, public, and educational partnership in Southeastern Pennsylvania to create start-up companies and develop new jobs. Nearly two decades later, this program is still thriving.

Throughout his career, Hawkins has served on a variety of boards and committees. He is currently a member of the board of directors of the Forum for the Future of Higher Education and the Washington Higher Education Secretariat. Hawkins served as a member of the board of trustees of the University of Richmond and the Consortium on Financing Higher Education (COFHE) General Assembly and as chair and member of the boards of Educom and CAUSE. He also served on the boards of the Coalition for Networked Information (CNI) and the International Consortium for Educational Computing. Additionally, Hawkins has been a member of higher education advisory boards for Apple, IBM, NeXT, Sun, and Microsoft and has served on more than 60 advisory panels for various colleges and universities.

He has written extensively, including four books, numerous articles, book chapters, and monographs on information resources, academic planning, and the use of technology in higher education. Hawkins has received two honorary doctorates of science. In 1991, he received the CAUSE ELITE Award, a lifetime achievement award for Exemplary Leadership and Information Technology Excellence. He has served actively on accreditation teams as a chair and member, as well as the standards committee for North East Association of Schools and Colleges. Hawkins has been an invited speaker at professional meetings including the American Association of Higher Education (AAHE), Educom, CAUSE, the Society for College and University Planning (SCUP), the American Association of Publishers (AAP), the Association for College Research Libraries (ACRL), the National Association of College Stores (NACS), the National Association of College and University Business Officers (NACUBO), and the National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges (NASULGC).


Diana Oblinger

Dr. Diana G. Oblinger President and CEO of EDUCAUSE

Dr. Diana G. Oblinger is President and CEO of EDUCAUSE, a nonprofit association whose mission is to advance higher education through the use of information technology. The current membership comprises over 2,300 colleges, universities and education organizations, including 250 corporations. Previously, Oblinger held positions in academia and business: Vice President for Information Resources and the Chief Information Officer for the University of North Carolina system, Executive Director of Higher Education for Microsoft, and IBM Director of the Institute for Academic Technology. She was on the faculty at the University of Missouri-Columbia and at Michigan State University and served as the associate dean of academic programs at the University of Missouri.

Since becoming president of EDUCAUSE, Oblinger has become known for innovative product and services growth as well as international outreach. For example, Oblinger created the EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative (ELI), known for its leadership in teaching, learning and technology innovation as well as several signature products, such as the 7 Things You Should Know About series. She also initiated EDUCAUSE's first fully online events and its e-book series, including Educating the Net Generation and Learning Spaces.

In collaboration with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation she led the creation of the Next Generation Learning Challenges, a $30M program focused on improving college readiness and completion through information technologies. Partners include the League for Innovation in the Community College, the International Association for K-12 Online Learning, the Council of Chief State School Officers, and the Hewlett Foundation.

Oblinger has served on a variety of boards such as the board of directors of ACT, the editorial board of Open Learning, the National Science Foundation's Advisory Committee on Cyberinfrastructure, and the National Visiting Committee for NSF's National Science Digital Library project. She currently serves on the American Council on Education (ACE) board and works with other higher education associations as chair of the Washington Higher Education Secretariat. Dr. Oblinger has testified before the U.S. Senate Committee on Employment, Safety and Training and the U.S. House of Representatives Subcommittee on Technology.

Oblinger is a frequent keynote speaker as well as the co-author of the award-winning book What Business Wants from Higher Education. She is the editor or co-editor of seven books: The Learning Revolution, The Future Compatible Campus, Renewing Administration, E is for Everything, Best Practices in Student Services, Educating the Net Generation, and Learning Spaces. She also is the author or co-author of numerous monographs and articles on higher education and technology.

Dr. Oblinger has received outstanding teaching and research awards, was named Young Alumnus of the Year by Iowa State University and holds two honorary degrees. She is a graduate of Iowa State University (Bachelors, Masters, and Ph.D.) and is a member of Phi Beta Kappa, Phi Kappa Phi, and Sigma Xi.


Stay Up-to-Date

RSS Email Twitter

Share Your Work and Ideas

Issues coming up will focus on learning environments, top 10 IT issues, and adaptive learning. Share your work and ideas with EDUCAUSE Review.

E-mail us >