CNI REPORT: Copyright and the Economics of Networked Information Copyright 1994 CAUSE. From _CAUSE/EFFECT_ Volume 17, Number 1, Spring 1994. Permission to copy or disseminate all or part of this material is granted provided that the copies are not made or distributed for commercial advantage, the CAUSE copyright and its date appear, and notice is given that copying is by permission of CAUSE, the association for managing and using information resources in higher education. To disseminate otherwise, or to republish, requires written permission. For further information, contact Julia Rudy at CAUSE, 4840 Pearl East Circle, Suite 302E, Boulder, CO 80301 USA; 303-939-0308; e-mail: jrudy@CAUSE.colorado.edu COPYRIGHT AND THE ECOMOMICS OF NETWORKED INFORMATION by Richard P. West From a technology point of view it is quite simple. Place a copy of, say, a scholarly journal on a file server, place the file server on the Internet, advertise its address, and every Internet surfer can be informed. Conceptually, one electronic version (with perhaps a few more copies for security and backup) can now do what previously could only be accomplished by making thousands of printed copies and physically distributing them to subscribers, libraries, and bookstores. Today's technology allows the display of full print pages as clearly as a printed page you would hold in your hand. The combination of telecommunications networking technology and inexpensive mass storage with excellent display monitors is the reason for these capabilities. A few copies of a journal article in a networked environment serve many more thousands of people than the traditional several thousand printed copies would reach. The promise of networked information to remove the barriers of time and space has been fulfilled. Technologically speaking, we have won the battle of making information universally accessible to all. Yet, by succeeding with our technological capabilities, we have now raised issues in several extremely important areas: the labyrinth of legal property rights; the complexity and frustration of getting permission to digitize materials; the economics of networked information; and the incentives and economic risks inherent in any marketplace in a capitalist society. Our ability to understand and resolve these issues will determine our success in exploiting our networked information technologies. The Coalition for Networked Information has several initiatives under way in this very important, but at times maddeningly complex, area. READI (Rights for Electronic Access to and Delivery of Information) has been a project of CNI for two years, identifying the consistent themes that any contractual arrangement between an information provider and an information consumer properly should consider in a networked environment. Other CNI initiatives include the exploration of the economics of networked information through the Task Force on Scientific and Technical Scholarly Information, sponsored by the Association of American Universities (AAU), and the solicitation of a grant from the Council on Library Resources (CLR) to further explore the changing economic environment for creating, distributing, organizing, and using networked information. The presence of CNI helped focus these questions with both providers and consumers recognizing that CNI provides a forum for exploring these issues. This article focuses on CNI's activities related to the non-technical implications of networked information. These areas divide into copyright law involving intellectual property; contractual rights negotiated between two parties; and the intriguing interplay of the forces of supply and demand and hence the price of networked information, i.e., the workings of an active economic marketplace for scholarly information. First, copyright issues. Questions dealing with copyright in a networked information environment are often characterized as copyright "problems," or the observed need to change underlying law involving copyright. At the risk of oversimplifying copyright issues, let me be provocative and say that underlying copyright law, which recognizes property rights of a producer/owner and gives protection to those rights, probably does not need to change nor, even more realistically, is it likely to change. Technological changes have been a challenge to the management of the property rights protected by copyright law for the past forty years. Copy machines, and now digitized information, have made the making of copies of traditional printed, and now networked, material easier and easier. Unfortunately, the ease of making these copies has not been matched, at least yet, by increased ease in compensating the owners of the intellectual property. To promote the copying and use of materials for the public good, owners and users of copyrighted materials developed the concept of "fair use" of such material. Use which is occasional and limited is allowed under this concept without additional compensation being paid to the property owner. Owners and users of copyrighted materials also developed guidelines for interlibrary loans, now mostly done by fax transmissions. Obviously, the relatively few copies allowed under "fair use" and interlibrary lending will not extend to the easy and widespread use of networked information that can be imagined by electronic journals on national and international networks. Much of the CNI discussion of copyright focuses on how to manage the appropriate payment of use fees to copyright owners of networked information in this new, more expansive setting. A second area of property rights management is site licenses and other multiple use or unlimited use arrangements that are contract arrangements between two parties that recognize the property rights of the producer or owner of the intellectual property recognized by copyright law. The terms of use and price are negotiable between the parties. CNI's READI project will have as one of its products a sample contract for networked information that can be adopted for specific use by higher education institutions. Since the price we will pay for networked information is governed primarily by contractual arrangements, it will be the economics of the marketplace which determine how much we pay for the scholarly materials we will want to use on the network. Supply and demand forces, as in all markets, should determine price in the scholarly information marketplace. However, certain journals are so important to a particular discipline that any major research library is pressured to subscribe to them, since such journals are the primary outlet of the most important work in that field. Empirical studies have shown that this phenomenon exists in the scientific journal area and creates a "monopolistic" good that can distort normal market forces and allow prices that escalate without regard to costs. The owners of intellectual property (who, particularly in the sciences, are commercial publishers) are in the power position to gain most from the new economics of networked information. This is not new. The print versions of today's scholarly journals and books are part of a very active capitalist marketplace. Our libraries participate in this market by purchasing hundreds of millions of dollars worth of information every year. What is new, however, is that we have new ways of receiving, storing, and distributing such information due to our improved communications and computing technologies. Increasingly, our challenge will be to manage a larger share of our information resources in electronic form rather than printed form. To take advantage of these new capabilities, we must rethink the way we manage our "purchased" information at our universities and colleges. In today's lexicon this requires reengineering our processes of acquiring and storing our information resources, and it will likely also require reengineering our processes of creating and distributing these resources. We are quite well organized to manage our print-based information, but we are not at all well organized for the management of electronic information. The CLR grant and the AAU studies focus on the need to assess the total cost of different ways of organizing and storing information. To not change our ways means we will not benefit from the economies presented by today's information technologies. ************************************************************************ Richard P. West is Vice Chancellor for Business and Finance for The California State University System. He has chaired the steering committee of the Coalition for Networked Information since its establishment in 1990. CNI Report is a regular CAUSE/EFFECT department that provides reports about the activities of the Coalition for Networked Information (CNI), formed by the Association of Research Libraries, CAUSE, and EDUCOM in 1990 to promote the creation of and access to information resources in networked environments. ************************************************************************ 03/30/94 (MEH) CNI REPORT: Copyright and the Economics of Networked Information