This paper is the intellectual property of the author(s). It was presented at CAUSE98, an EDUCAUSE conference, and is part of that conference's online proceedings. See http://www.educause.edu/copyright.html for additional copyright information.

CAUSE98 Logo

Service From a Distance: The Use of Information Technologies in Support of Off-Campus Students

By Barbara J. D'Angelo and Barry M. Maid, Ph.D.

Higher education's increased use of distance education multiplies the problem of providing equitable support and service to off-campus students. While there are many instances where information technologies and telecommunications are being used for innovative forms of instruction, less emphasis is placed on providing services that support that instruction. Examined is the use of one form of networked information technology, a multi-user object-oriented environment, to provide composition tutoring and library services to distance education students.


Introduction

Academic support services such as tutoring centers and libraries have traditionally been de facto outside of the "official academy." While it is difficult to think of a modern university operating without these services, they are commonly just an afterthought in issues as far-reaching as curriculum design and funding. Therefore, it should come as no surprise that as many institutions attempt to move their course work into virtual environments to meet what appears to be a "there for the picking" distance education market that academic support services are still an afterthought--if they're thought of at all.

Despite this reality, accrediting agencies, virtual universities, and distance learning programs do require to some degree that academic support services be in place for programs to be viable. For example, the Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools' Criteria for Accreditation state "For distance learning activities, an institution must ensure the provision of and ready access to adequate library/learning resources and services to support the courses, programs, and degrees offered."1 In a report prepared for the Council for Higher Education Accreditation addressing quality in distance learning, support services are deemed to be one criteria for accreditation and one of the "most distinctive features of quality control in distance learning" programs.2

Virtual universities have shown varying degrees of commitment to providing support services to students. For example, the Southern Regional Electronic Campus does not make a strong commitment to supporting these services; but does state that "Academic standards for all programs or courses offered electronically are the same as those for other courses delivered..." and that institutional commitment should ensure that "Enrolled students have reasonable and adequate access to the range of student services and resources appropriate to their learning."3 On the other hand, Western Governor's University (WGU) has made a stronger commitment in its mission statement proclaiming that one of the core activities of the WGU entails:

"providing an appropriate array of support services to students studying at a distance (including library services, advisement and counseling, financial aid, and various types of skills assessment) either electronically or through a network of local centers." 4


This lack of consistency in support services by distance programs is of concern. As Ernest Boyer has written, "The College Library must be viewed as a vital part of the undergraduate experience....".5 This statement is equally true whether that experience is traditional or nontradition, on- or off-campus.


The Project

The Virtual Library Project on ArkMOO began as an outgrowth of the original Writing Center Consultation Project. In the original project, graduate students from the University of Arkansas at Little Rock worked as virtual peer tutors (using both synchronous and asynchronous technologies) for first year composition students at Roane State Community College in Oak Ridge, TN.6 After several years of working as a pilot project, this concept was funded by the Arkansas State Legislature to deliver similar services to Arkansas community college students.7 The initial participating Arkansas community colleges are in Fort Smith and North Little Rock.

It was within this context that Barry Maid and Barbara D'Angelo started an online discussion. Maid, with several years' experience in delivering online support services through cybertutoring and in developing Online Writing Labs (OWLs), thought D'Angelo's suggestion of providing virtual library support was a logical extension of the work he had been doing. As a result, the two planned and D'Angelo implemented a Virtual Library on ArkMOO.


Technologies Used

The Virtual Library Project incorporates and integrates several Internet-based technologies--primarily MOO, the World Wide Web, and email. A MOO (Mud, Object-Oriented) is little more than a large database which resides on an Internet-linked server. It provides a place for synchronous conversation for anyone on the Internet. While the ability to engage in synchronous conversation makes MOOs sound much like "chat rooms," in reality they are much more. MOOs provide an opportunity for people to extend the database that is the MOO in ways that enable the construction of text-based virtual reality. It is also possible to create and program individual objects on the MOO that others may interact with. These functions of the MOO environment provide rich educational opportunities for students who participate in cybertutoring. This holds true, as well, for students who choose to use the Virtual Library on the MOO.

Over the past few years, several MOO programmers have developed World Wide Web (WWW) interfaces for MOOs. ArkMOO makes use of one of these interfaces. There are several advantages to using this interface. A user has the ability to access ArkMOO through a java-based telnet client and then invoke particular web pages which pop up in a browser window. Depending on the command used, a particular webpage pops up in the user's browser window or in the browser windows of all those currently logged on to the MOO with that particular client program and who are in the same MOO "room." The ability to control the browser window of others is, of course, a potentially powerful pedagogical tool. Instructors logged in at their computers at one site can give a visual presentation to students logged in at other sites. By using both visuals and synchronous text, instructors and classes are able to simulate more face-to-face class situations.

In addition to both MOO and the World Wide Web, the Virtual Library on ArkMOO uses email so students can contact the librarian asynchronously. Our idea was that it was important for students to get a response to their queries. Even a response that was several hours old was better than no response or no opportunity to ask the question.


Rationale for the Project

Perhaps the first question that needs to be asked is: Why bother? After all, the community college students have library resources at their own institutions. Yet, there does appear to be good reasons for offering students enrolled in onsite classes the same opportunity as offered to distant students. These reasons are all related to the issue of time, resources, and equity of access. The original Writing Center Consultation Project was conceived not because the Oak Ridge campus of Roane State Community College did not provide tutorial services but rather because it could not provide sufficient tutorial services. Traditional models of using peer tutors didn't work in that environment. Likewise, Arkansas community colleges have physical libraries, though the resources present in those libraries vary significantly.

The Virtual Library Project on ArkMOO is seen not as a replacement for onsite library services but rather as added value, providing remote services that the physical libraries may not be able to provide. It is not unusual for the lives of community college students to be balancing acts. While their coursework requires them to do library work, sometimes their schedules make that extremely difficult. By creating the Virtual Library on ArkMOO, we are offering students, especially the growing number of non-traditional students, an opportunity to successfully complete their assignments while juggling their complicated lives--students who have severe time limitations can log in at any time of the day or night. Students, for example, who must stay at home evenings, perhaps because of child care necessities, are able to log on and work without leaving their homes. This is just one of the common problems the Virtual Library on ArkMOO is designed to address. In addition, the very nature of the project leads toward the librarian providing a set of resources tailored toward the specific course need. Ultimately, the concept of faculty member and librarian working more closely as a team in order to provide students better information to guide the students' learning can only benefit the whole educational endeavor. By working together, teaching faculty and librarian have the opportunity to not only provide better information but can also create a community of learning that demonstrates the interconnectedness of reading, writing, and research.


The Virtual Library on ArkMOO

Libraries have used a variety of technologies to address the needs of off-campus students including webliographies, tutorials, remote access to databases, email, video, and chat rooms/MOOs. While asynchronous use of technology such as webliographies, tutorials, database access, and email ensure that students have access to services; they do not fulfill the social function of the library8 nor provide the opportunity for real-time communication or collaboration with a librarian. To overcome this, libraries have experimented with using video and other interactive technologies for instruction and reference.

The Virtual Library on ArkMOO provides services to community college students in Arkansas both asynchronously through provision of general and class-specific resources and email as well as synchronously through the availability of a librarian for reference help via the MOO.




Figure 1. The main library room on ArkMOO


The Library was initially designed to be accessible via the MOO. A main library room (see Figure 1) was built with adjoining rooms (See Figure 2) for each category of resources. D'Angelo consulted with the instructors at Pulaski Technical College and Westark Community College at the beginning of the Spring 1998 semester and built a set of Internet-based resources for each class based on the course syllabi and assignments. Resources were accessible via the MOO through web objects. When viewing an object, the user could access in a browser window a webpage with a set of links for the particular topic while remaining on ArkMOO. Although the webpages were also available to be viewed via the WWW, the intention was for access to be through ArkMOO to take advantage of the display option. This option allows for simultaneous viewing of the same resource by anyone in the same room, a powerful tool for instruction and collaboration. In addition to the resources created for the classes at Pulaski Tech and Westark, a set of more general reference resources were developed for use by anyone.



Figure 2. Pulaski Tech room with class-specific web objects


Based on experiences and observations from the Spring semester, the Virtual Library was redesigned and revamped over Summer 1998. A main webpage (See Figure 3) was created to allow for easier navigation through the Library for those accessing it via the WWW. From this main page, links were created to reference help, tutorials, and the collection of resources. An object was created in the main library room on ArkMOO to allow for connection to the main webpage via the MOO Library as well as through the URL. Now, the library is easily accessible either via ArkMOO or via the WWW.



Figure 3. The ArkMOO Library Webpage


D'Angelo met with the instructors at both Pulaski Tech and Westark to again discuss plans for the semester and created a new set of resources for Pulaski Tech based on the assignments for the Fall 1998 semester. The web objects in each of the rooms were also updated. In addition, a set of tutorials was added to enhance the Library's use, including tutorials on effectively using Internet search engines, creating effective search strategies, and critical analysis skills.

Reference help is available via a link from the main page to an "Ask a Librarian" page for reference help. During the Spring 1998 semester, D'Angelo had scheduled reference hours to be available on ArkMOO for help and consultation. For the Fall 1998 semester, rather than reference hours, students would use email to send a question or to request a time to meet on ArkMOO for help. Direct email access is available via the "Ask a Librarian" page as well as from ArkMOO. The use of email to schedule meetings for help is more in line with the way the cybertutoring program works. In addition, a bulletin board for posting questions on the "Ask a Librarian" page was contemplated and discussed but has not yet been implemented.


The Problems: Technical and Political

Technical

During the initial semester of the Virtual Library Project in Spring 1998, many problems were encountered, some of which were addressed in the redesign and expansion of the Library over the Summer. However, some remain to be solved.

The established way of accessing a MUD/MOO is through telnet or via a text-based client application. However, because the Library's resources are web-based it is necessary to use a java-based client program which allows for a web browser and a text window to be open at the same time. These two windows are not integrated, meaning that the user has to navigate between the two windows in order to communicate on the MOO in the text window and view the resources in the browser window. While not a difficult task, it could be daunting to an inexperienced or new user. Training and follow-up support can solve this problem along with practice using the system. Maid is also exploring the potential of another java-based client program which would integrate the text window and browser window into one.

Since connection to ArkMOO is via the Internet, slow connections or frequent disconnections dampen the enthusiasm of even the most enthusiastic user. These can cause delays, interruptions, and breaks in communication. For example, on the day of training for Pulaski Tech, D'Angelo was disconnected from ArkMOO due to a bad connection and was not able to reconnect during the class session. This happened in the middle of a conversation with a student who was reticent about using the technology and certainly must have been disconcerting to him.

Of prime concern to librarians is the question of database access. Remote access to the databases and online catalogs at the community colleges is problematic. Even though it is technologically possible to create a web object to them to make them accessible via ArkMOO, the legalities of licensing agreements prohibit this. Although remote access to some databases and the online catalog at the University of Arkansas at Little Rock where ArkMOO is based is possible, the community college students are not affiliated with the University and do not have access to them. Also, D'Angelo is not affiliated with either UALR or the community colleges. Therefore, even if remote access were available, she would not be able to link to them due to licensing agreements.


Political

Anytime institutions of higher education, especially state institutions, get involved in working with other institutions political problems are inevitable. This inevitability becomes increased and intensified when the institutions are in different states. We saw this happen with the original Writing Center Consultation Project. We were, therefore, very cognizant that by using a librarian from a Louisiana university to work on a project that is designed to help Arkansas students we would evoke more political issues. While being aware of the problem and attempting to lay the groundwork for successful collaboration, we have not successfully solved all the problems.

Our initial suggestion to resolve this problem was still based on geography. Colleges and universities in both Arkansas and Louisiana are members of the Southern Regional Educational Board (SREB) which has recently developed the Southern Regional Electronic Campus (SREC), a consortium of distant learning courses similar to Western Governor's University. We were hoping that since SREC presently only concerns itself with courses, not academic support services, that we might be seen as filling a necessary niche and could be provided institutional support and resources for a collaboration our institutions and their governing bodies had already committed to. This may prove to be a viable way to solve the problem in the future. However, in conversations Maid has had with the Arkansas representative to the SREC, Maid's sense is that the SREC's current focus is on delivering academic courses and that providing academic support is an issue which they acknowledge will need to be faced in the future.

At a more basic level, however, there exists a real problem in job description and time allocation. As a faculty member, Maid can justify his time and work in the project as research--especially in the area of developing new pedagogies which make use of emerging technologies. On the other hand, D'Angelo is a reference librarian at a different institution in a different state. Although her work on the Virtual Library Project is supported by her library, it is not part of her institution-specific duties. In order for this or future collaborations to succeed, issues of job description and time allocation will have to be resolved at each individual institution. In addition, participating in these kinds of activities must be valued in both yearly evaluation and promotion and tenure decisions.


Timing and Lessons

We have come to believe through our work on this project that despite some obstacles, the technological issues can be mastered and overcome. By using Internet resources such as email, MOO, and the World Wide Web, we can deliver quality academic support services to distant students. We may sometimes become frustrated with the technology, but the technology only provides stumbling blocks not true obstacles.

However, there are real obstacles to the project. Like so much about the Internet, these obstacles have nothing to do with technology but rather have to do with people. Beyond the already cited political issues, we have literally had to cope with issues of life and death-especially with regard to the project's main target campus, Pulaski Technical College in North Little Rock, AR. In Spring 1998 around halfway through the project's first semester, the cooperating instructor at Pulaski Tech, Jackolyn Barnhouse, very unexpectedly died. Her replacement was not comfortable using the technology. During the fall 1998 semester, the new Pulaski Tech instructor, Amy Baldwin, had a baby in late October. This time, however, her replacement is Jayn�e Linkous who is also Maid's graduate assistant on the Cyberspace Project. Linkous has already begun to introduce the Pulaski Tech students to the online tutorials and guides provided by D'Angelo as ArkMOO librarian. We expect to see more use and response from these students during the remainder of the semester.

As a result, we expect to have more substantial information on student usage by mid-December 1998 after the end of the Pulaski Tech semester. However, even during less than one year of the small scale project, we are seeing certain important trends emerge. Using the Internet to provide academic support services for students over distance is already a reality. There may be multiple means of delivery of those services, but it is no longer that difficult nor that costly to accomplish. The more serious problems are the old-fashioned kind. How do we get institutions that are funded by and answer to differing constituencies to make use of the collaboration made possible by emerging technologies? How do we create a broad base of faculty expertise so that we will not have just one or two "techno-savvy" faculty per unit or institution? We realize in many ways these are old questions. Yet, until they get addressed, the potential emerging technologies offer to our teachers and students will go unrealized.


Endnotes

1Southern Association of Colleges and Schools, Commission on Colleges (1996) Criteria for Accreditation, p. 59.

Back to text

2Institute for Higher Education Policy (April 1998) Assuring Quality in Distance Learning (report prepared for the Council for Higher Education Accreditation).

Back to text

3Southern Regional Electrionic Campus, Principles of Good Practice.

Back to text

4Western Governors' University, Vision, History, and Mission.

Back to text

5Boyer, Ernest L. (1987) College. The Undergraduate Experience San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc., p. 164.

Back to text

6Jordan-Henley, Jennifer and Maid, Barry (January 1995) "MOOving along the Information Superhighway: Writing Centers in Cyberspace." The Writing Lab Newsletter.

Back to text

7Jordan-Henley, Jennifer and Maid, Barry (1998) "Advice to the Linelorn: Crossing State Borders and the Politics of Cyberspace." To appear in Taking Flight with OWLS: Research into Technology Use in Writing Centers. Donna Sewell and James Inman, eds. Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Back to text

8D'Angelo, Barbara J. and Maid, Barry M. (1998) Virtual Classroom, Virtual Library: Library Services for an Online Writing Laboratory. RUSQ Submitted.

Back to text


Menubar Imagemap