Copyright 1998 CAUSE. From CAUSE/EFFECT Volume 20, Number 4, Winter 1997-98, pp. 4-7, 62-63. Permission to copy or disseminate all or part of this material is granted provided that the copies are not made or distributed for commercial advantage, the CAUSE copyright and its date appear, and notice is given that copying is by permission of CAUSE, the association for managing and using information resources in higher education. To disseminate otherwise, or to republish, requires written permission. For further information, contact Jim Roche at CAUSE, 4840 Pearl East Circle, Suite 302E, Boulder, CO 80301 USA; 303-939-0308; e-mail: [email protected]
The CAUSE Current Issues Committee is responsible for proposing a list of current or developing issues and trends that are important to the future of information resources management and use in higher education. The following topics have been identified by the committee as key emerging or ongoing issues. We encourage articles for CAUSE/EFFECT on these and related topics.
Our colleges and universities depend on effective use of information technology for instruction, research, and administration. With high demand for technology professionals, it is critical that we continue to recruit, retain, and retrain competent staff. Recruiting challenges include reduced numbers of graduates in computer-related fields, lack of competitive salaries in the higher education environment, and increasing market demand for information technology skills. The continuing explosion of technological change also forces existing staff to continually upgrade their technical skills. As the demand for information technology professionals continues to exceed the supply, our institutions will face even greater staffing challenges. Key issues we will need to discuss, if not resolve, in the next few years include these:
- How can we make our salaries more competitive with the industry? What non-salary benefits can we offer and promote?
- How can we promote our institution as a good place to work? What changes can we make to our environment, both physical facilities and culture, to make it more appealing to existing staff and recruits?
- What other tools can we use for recruitment and retention incentives?
- How can we improve our recruitment processes to enable us to respond more quickly to the changing market demands for information technology professionals?
- Are there better ways for titling/classifying staff? How can we restructure our compensation systems to be more skill- and performance-based?
- What staff development/training programs are needed to adequately keep existing staff abreast of technological change and develop their professional skills?
- How do we put together trainee programs that work? With whom should we partner?
- How can we hire our own graduates before the outside industries hire them?
College and university initiatives in enhanced networking connectivity and in advanced applications development are the basis for building new knowledge communities of researchers, faculty, and students. Application areas include digital libraries, distance-independent instruction and collaboration, access to remote scientific instruments, remote medical diagnosis, and others. For reasons of security, licensing, etc., people and resources will need unique identities that are properly authenticated and authorized for access. Since application users will connect with people and resources at both local and remote campuses, both campuswide infrastructures and inter-campus communication mechanisms will be necessary. Policy challenges include establishing where access control is determined in the environment (e.g., in the case of digital publications, by publishers or by the university). Technology challenges include identifying and deploying the appropriate solutions (e.g, private key and/or public key). Other issues include:
- Determining access rights (who gets access to what and who decides)
- Establishing standards across networks and multiple locations
- Assessing risk and liability
- Creating scalable solutions to support millions of users in the overall environment
- Defining interoperability guidelines
- Identifying providers for such services as inter-campus certificate authority
- Addressing international issues around encryption export
- Evaluating when firewalls should be used
- Identifying new roles (e.g., who�s responsible for maintaining network and data integrity)
- Evaluating the government�s role in setting policies, such as with encryption standards
- Dealing with ethical issues that occur, for example, around privacy
For many institutions the approach of the Year 2000 has provided the impetus needed to replace legacy enterprise software systems with new, client/server-based, Year-2000 compliant systems. For this reason, growth has been phenomenal among the manufacturers and consulting firms that provide higher education with systems for human resources, financial records, and student information. Each of them has an unprecedented number of implementation projects under way at colleges and universities worldwide. This means that a bonanza of data is available on the cost, both predictable and hidden, of new system implementations. We can all benefit from open discussion of the many questions that are arising:
- Do we have enough data now to predict the costs of implementing specific systems?
- What strategies can we adopt to minimize licensing costs and the costs of data conversion and system implementation?
- How can we ensure that campus leadership will continue to back a project when faced (perhaps mid-way into the implementation) with the true financial and human costs?
- Which vendors are best able to carry an implementation through to completion on schedule? Which vendors will succumb to the consequences of too-rapid growth?
- What strategies permit the quickest implementations?
- What�s the right software decision: Best of breed or integrated? �Vanilla� implementation or tailored to the campus?
- How realistic is the idea of a vanilla system implementation -- one that involves very little customization of the vendor�s system? Does such an implementation work at cross purposes to business process redesign (BPR) and the identification of best practices?
- How tightly should BPR and system implementation be linked? Can they be separated at all!?
- Enterprise systems cover a lot of territory. How can an implementation be kept manageable? Is �scope creep� avoidable?
- How can we best meet the technology challenges (scaling, interoperability, security, database selection)?
Increasingly, new students come to our campuses prepared with a broad range of computing skills and viewing computing as a tool fundamental to their education. Many students consider on-campus and remote access to common computing resources such as e-mail, Internet, and popular software packages as a free commodity. Students have also begun to expect colleges and universities to provide more online services similar to those offered by other industries (such as banking and retail). Furthermore, the use of network and distance learning technologies are helping higher education create an anytime, anywhere, interactive, and collaborative learning environment. While these new technologies hold promises, we urgently need new planning and service models and funding strategies to support student expectations in these areas. Key issues we need to address in meeting these challenges include:
- What constitutes a base level of technology support and tools for students?
- How can we develop a process to define appropriate standards for student technology support and services?
- What roles should students play in developing and communicating such standards?
- What are appropriate organization models for meeting student technology needs?
- What new technology support should be considered for students served by distance learning technology?
- How do we address student training needs for new technology?
- How do we increase student use of existing technology resources?
- How do we communicate the costs and benefits associated with new online student services?
- What costing models should be considered for different types of services and support?
- What pricing strategies have been successfully employed by different types of colleges and universities?
- What criteria should we use to measure the return on investment for technology support to meet student expectations?
More higher education institutions are getting serious about reaching out beyond their walls and providing distributed learning or distance education opportunities. Traditional models of teaching -- classroom-bound, faculty-centered, degree-focused, �brick-and-mortar� expansions -- are losing ground as the sole option for educating the 21st century student. There are many factors fueling this redefinition of education as distributed learning. These include business demand for reskilling employees, growth of the non-traditional student market, remote interactive technologies, and new brokering arrangements such as the Western Governors University. Gartner Group estimates that by the year 2000, more than 75 percent of traditional colleges and universities will use distributed learning technologies in one or more traditional academic programs. Statistics from the U.S. Department of Education indicate that Americans twenty-five or older will account for five of every eleven college students. DOE numbers suggest that the number of students thirty-five or older will exceed those who are eighteen and nineteen. Gartner also claims that by 1999, an increasing number of general education and core requirements will be delivered to undergraduates via distance technologies. As information technology professionals, we will need to be a part of the discussions undertaken on our campuses to discuss, if not resolve, a number of issues in the immediate future:
- How will the institution sustain a network and desktop infrastructure to support a robust distributed model?
- What are the real costs of the new technology-based distributed learning environment, and how will it be financed?
- How will the institution deal with faculty issues such as training, rewards, resistance? What roles will change, i.e., who will do what in a distributed environment?
- What administrative policies will need to be revamped to handle such things as credit, fees, transfers, partnerships, degree source?
- What new operations issues will need to be supported, e.g., privacy and security?
- How will the support issues be addressed (technical support, help desk)?
- How will our institutions deal with competition from business entities?
- What implications are there for community and student life activities, e.g., recreation centers and fee-based campus services?
- Which courses are viable candidates for new modes of delivery?
- What are the implications for curriculum development and new learning models?
- How will outcomes be assessed?
The digital revolution is dramatically changing the ways we create, store, and distribute information and has precipitated a re-examination of law and policies governing intellectual property. As both creators and consumers of information, institutions of higher education need to provide leadership in addressing the questions that concern intellectual property policy in the digital age. Can the current balance between proprietary rights and exceptions for educational and scholarly purposes be preserved in the digital environment? As beneficiaries of the free flow of information, universities and colleges need to be active advocates for keeping at least some types of instructional and scholarly information affordably accessible. Issues include:
- As more information is produced only in digital form, how will this material be preserved for future scholarly endeavors? Who will be charged with preserving our intellectual heritage of the digital age? How might changes in copyright law hinder access to and copying of information for preservation purposes?
- With the increasing digitization of instructional and scholarly information, what role will higher education play as producer and distributor of electronic information?
- If higher education institutions expand their roles as producers and distributors of information, will they expect more control of faculty-produced material? If so, will they be in direct conflict with faculty who expect to profit from their own intellectual property?
- With regard to developing course material electronically, what model of ownership should be followed? Should the traditional textbook model be used, or should different models of ownership, such as the patent model, be developed?
- Should universities and colleges be more actively involved in creating new, more competitive marketplaces for research information by providing new opportunities for electronic publishing? This is especially compelling in light of the industry trend toward consolidation of commercial publishing firms accompanied by rapidly escalating prices for both print and electronic publications.
Managing Expectations in the Face of Rising Demand and Declining Budgets
Most information technology organizations continue to be challenged by the rising support costs associated with the distributed computing environment. Early in the personal computer lifetime most information technology offices tried to encourage �early adopters� to use technology solutions in the classroom and administrative offices. In doing so we tended to give away the resource or at least didn�t charge a fee for services. The ubiquity of campus networks has changed the landscape radically. Computers are now being connected to campus networks at ever increasing rates. Most campus environments now include networks in residence halls which, for some, doubled the number of computers connected to the campus network. Customers expect central support units to support extremely complex desktop environments, based on the traditional �free� paradigm. Exacerbating this situation are:
- increased opportunities for campus customers to acquire the latest technology
- new expectations for student, faculty, and staff training programs
- the rapidly changing information technology field
- increased demands arising from campus standards and strategies, e.g., one department acquires new technology, everybody else wants the same
- embedding of information technology in the curriculum
- expectations that the central information technology organization will introduce and support change at an ever-increasing pace, leading institutional transformation.
Strategies for dealing with these increasing expectations and declining budgets might include:
- partnering within the institution to ensure buy-in before generating solutions
- use of licensing and consortial agreements
- presenting new economic models that identify the true costs associated with networked computing
- garnering faculty and student agreement on realistic support levels
- strengthening communication strategies to ensure that customers understand what services will be provided and at what cost
- empowering customers through better training programs
- more effective planning and priority setting
- finding simpler, less elegant solutions
- re-deploying/recycling of information technology on campus.
We have begun to recognize how the complexity of networked environments affects our distributed support models, making it more difficult and costly to isolate problems and fix them. This has exacerbated the ongoing challenge of IT staffs coping with increasing demands for customer support services, typically with limited resources. Although the scope of IT support may vary by size of institution, the basic challenges and issues are quite similar:
- What are the best current practices and under what circumstances are they optimal: central support, departmental support, no specialized support, or some combination of these models?
- Can IT staffs continue to support the �all you can eat� model or are there insufficient resources to meet the insatiable demand?
- What mechanisms do we put in place to encourage users to use scarce resources judiciously?
- What effects will responsibility-based budgeting have on the distributed model?
- How do we balance the need for �fire fighting� with the goal of long-term fixes?
- How do we get ahead of the problem? Can establishing teams across organizational boundaries or training departmental staff to provide first-line support resolve the challenges?
The networked campus offers the opportunity for distributing information, applications, or access across organizational barriers as well as across institutional cultures. In this distributed environment, the IT organization is finding it necessary to re-examine its core values and address a number of issues related to information access.
- Computers intended for personal use are capable of serving as file servers, Web servers, mail servers, etc. Improperly configured servers present security and network performance challenges for IT departments. As two- and three-tiered applications are developed, traditional network designs will need to be updated to accommodate object request broker (ORB), proxy servers, and electronic commerce servers in secure and manageable configurations. Appliance-, switch, or server-based firewalls will be required to secure transactions and to provide front-line security for unwary users.
- Organizations will have to re-examine volume or site licenses for applications across departments and sites. New management considerations include the need to find more effective ways than IP address to validate users of library databases.
- The number of public-access computers located in libraries, computer labs, or student unions calls for strong distributed software management tools, managed printer solutions, and secured browser applications (e.g., conferencing, e-mail). Complicating the already difficult balance of administering dispersed networks and servers, academic software applications often require varying versions of operating systems, browser tools, and software development kits.
- Filtering of news, bulletin boards, and other public discussions remains a sensitive issue for higher education sites, particularly with the advent of anonymous or public e-mail accounts. We will need to develop institutional information access policies that take into account legal issues for minors, academic freedom, information ownership issues, freedom of speech, privacy, information archiving, copyright and fair use, enforcement procedures, and many other areas of potential policy.