Mentoring in Higher Education IT, 2019

Characteristics of Mentoring Relationships: Engaging with Differences and Similarities

When seeking a potential mentor or protégé, an individual may have a list of desired attributes. A potential mentee may want to identify a peer who is of the same gender, an executive of the same ethnicity, or an older senior manager who can impart to a protégé lessons gained from experience.1 Having a mentor of the same gender who is similar in age or ethnicity establishes a basis for understanding experiences or challenges in the workplace specific to the mentee. Women may want to find a senior female mentor who can offer insight into how she advanced in a predominantly male workforce, for example. Nevertheless, being in a mentoring relationship with someone who has a different ethnicity or gender can also be beneficial. Such a relationship can offer opportunities for career advancement for women and non-whites in predominantly male or white workplaces.2 Different-gender mentoring may also be beneficial because it offers both parties a learning opportunity to understand similar—or different—experiences and perspectives in the workplace.3 To better understand how these mentoring relationships are structured, we asked mentors and mentees to characterize their relationships on the basis of gender, ethnicity, workplace status (peer or manager), and stage in career (figure 4).

Bar graph showing characteristics of mentee and mentor relationships. All data is approximate. Relationship with primary mentee: Same gender = 60%; Different genders = 40%; Same ethnicity = 60%; Different ethnicities = 40%; Senior executive mentor, aspiring level executive mentee = 30%; Manager-level mentor, individual-contributor mentee = 35%; Early-career mentor, later-career mentee = 5%; Peer mentors = 45% Relationship with primary mentor: Same gender = 60%; Different genders = 40%; Same ethnicity = 65%; Different ethnicities = 35%; Senior executive mentor, aspiring level executive mentee = 55%; Manager-level mentor, individual-contributor mentee = 20%; Early-career mentor, later-career mentee = 1%; Peer mentors = 40%
Figure 4. Characteristics of mentee and mentor relationships

When looking at mentoring relationships based on career stages and whether one is a mentor or a mentee (lower half of figure 4), the characteristics reflect what we'd typically consider a classic mentoring relationship. Mentors (31%) were often engaged in a traditional relationship, i.e., manager to mentee (individual contributor). Half (51%) of protégés were aspiring executives with senior executive mentors. This confirms that protégés perceive career benefits from such an arrangement. These perceptions are well founded, given that those who have a mentor may be more likely to experience gains in salary or career development.4

We also found the peer mentoring model to be prominent, accounting for 44% of mentors' relationships.5 By "ditching the hierarchy," individuals may be on more equal footing in the relationship, since they are likely in the same stage of their career.6 They might collaborate to share networking contacts, get professional development experience, or simply support each other's career path choices.7 Senior staff may need a peer to offer specific feedback and support as they address challenges in the latter half of their career.8 This is good news for both organizations and individuals. Peer mentoring can increase collaboration, address individual needs for support, and boost sharing of institutional knowledge, which could be particularly useful for institutions that are shifting administrative structures or undergoing system change.9 Moreover, having a peer mentor may contribute substantially to career development, particularly for women who aspire to executive positions at their institution.10

Significantly more ethnic minority mentors (37%) participated in early-career peer mentoring relationships than white mentors (17%). This is encouraging for ethnic minorities in higher education IT because early-career mentoring has been associated with career development and being fast-tracked into executive positions.11 Additionally, mentoring of underrepresented ethnic minorities can improve retention in predominantly white institutions via connections with mentors who understand the career struggles specific to their mentees.12 Whites and ethnic minorities engaged in identical rates (52%) of mentoring relationships consisting of an aspiring executive and an executive mentor. This is also encouraging, since some studies suggest that ethnic minority managers' mentors invested in them as potential managers.13

Overall, mentoring relationships tend to involve members of the same gender (64%). These findings may reflect the fact that protégés, who frequently initiate relationships, are seeking mentors of the same gender.14 For women, having a female mentor can be important for role modeling: if a female employee "can see it, she can be it"—meaning that female executive mentors can provide a roadmap and guidance for a successful career.15 Although having a strong female mentor can be of benefit to aspiring women employees, being mentored by a man may also be beneficial not only to the mentee but also the organization. Our findings are encouraging in that more than a third of mentoring relationships involve a male–female dynamic.

Engaging in mixed-gender mentoring relationships can contribute to gender inclusiveness, which involves "both men and women in advancing women's leadership," especially for women working in male-majority industries.16

Notes

  1. Sarah Frances Bailey, Elora C. Voyles, Lisa Finkelstein, and Kristina Matarazzo, "Who Is Your Ideal Mentor? An Exploratory Study of Mentor Prototypes," Career Development International 21, no. 2 (2016): 160–175.

    ↩︎
  2. Alexandra Kalev, Frank Dobbin, and Erin Kelly, "Best Practices or Best Guesses? Assessing the Efficacy of Corporate Affirmative Action and Diversity Policies," American Sociological Review 71, no. 4 (2006): 589–617.

    ↩︎
  3. Geri Stengel, "Men and Women Benefit When Mentorship Cross[es] the Gender Divide," Forbes, June 13, 2018.

    ↩︎
  4. See, for example, Anton James Duvall, "Calculating a Mentor's Effect on Salary and Retention," Financial Management, November 30, 2016.

    ↩︎
  5. This is the sum of early-, mid-, and later-career peer mentoring.

    ↩︎
  6. Chrissy Scivicque, "The Benefits of Peer Mentorship: What You Can Gain When You Ditch the Hierarchy," Ivy Exec.

    ↩︎
  7. Susan E. Metros and Catherine Yang, "The Importance of Mentors," in Cultivating Careers: Professional Development for Campus IT, ed. Susan E. Metros, EDUCAUSE (2006).

    ↩︎
  8. Scivicque, "The Benefits of Peer Mentorship."

    ↩︎
  9. Linda Holbeche, "Peer Mentoring: The Challenges and Opportunities," Career Development International 1, no. 7 (1996): 24–27.

    ↩︎
  10. Lilian H. Hill and Celeste A. Wheat, "The Influence of Mentorship and Role Models on University Women Leaders' Career Paths to University Presidency," The Qualitative Report 22, no. 8 (2017): 2090–2111.

    ↩︎
  11. See Catherine A. Hansman, "Diversity and Power in Mentoring Relationships," in Critical Perspectives on Mentoring: Trends and Issues, ed. C. A. Hansman, ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education (2002): 44–53.

    ↩︎
  12. Ruth Enid Zambrana, Rashawn Ray, Michelle M. Espino, Corinne Castro, Beth Douthirt Cohen, and Jennifer Eliason, "'Don't Leave Us Behind': The Importance of Mentoring for Underrepresented Minority Faculty," American Educational Research Journal 52, no. 1 (2015): 40–72.

    ↩︎
  13. David A. Thomas, "The Truth about Mentoring Minorities: Race Matters," Harvard Business Review 79, no. 4 (2001): 98–107.

    ↩︎
  14. Bailey et al., "Who Is Your Ideal Mentor?"

    ↩︎
  15. Kailynn Bowling, "Why Female Mentorship in the Workplace Is More Important Than Ever," Forbes, August 3, 2018.

    ↩︎
  16. Anna Marie Valerio and Katina Sawyer, "The Men Who Mentor Women," Harvard Business Review, December 7, 2016.

    ↩︎